Wednesday 29 December 2010

Maio binion

Some friends of mine did a battle in Caste Age. They did a CTA with a rule - only for level 250 below. Now, a level 673 High King jumped in and did 40 million plus damage, my sweet girls got nothing. Now, what this high king did was clearly unjust to them, and was ignoring the rules.

However, and this is the part why the sisters* hate me, this rule of theirs was not the most effective... "in my opinion". Level numbers are overrated. For example, let's say two players never quest. They are level 200, meaning 1000 skill points. One puts 400 on attack, and 400 on stamina. The other spreads points equally, putting 200 on attack and stamina. P1 has now 400 attack, and 200 stamina, P2 has 200 attack, and 100 stamina. Theoretically, P1 does twice as much damage as P2. So, I think setting a level limit is less effective than to put damage limit.

In short, level number is not necessarily relevant. And I feel very strongly about this, as I have 500 defence, which means I have enormously small attack compared to others at level 360. Okay, facts. My attack is 263; my friend's attack is 400+, and he is level 241.

The rule of "250 and below" can be heavily abused. In extreme example, if someone really wants, that someone can make an account, never play except to pray, and boom!, in three years - level 1 player with 200 stamina and 750 attack.

And now, especially to those who constantly bash me for having this useless, worthless, utter scum, otherwise known as defence. Firstly, my comment on the topic:


And to answer the second question... People with brains do need defence when attacking. At least in monsters with party health, defence, or shield. You do know that your attacks have a bigger amount of points when your attack is bigger? Well, no reason to think defence points are related to the amount of pigeon poop on the roof... Sorry, I have no proof, but rumour has it, there's a secret threshold, where your defence amount gets considerably better. Azriel's is supposedly 300.

You could say, with tears of ever so sweet love in your eyes, that you, the "attacker", have me, the "defender", but the truth is, you can't do anything without defence.

When you go to a snowball fight, it is most probably cold outside. You need to have a good throwing arm, but you also need to defend your body against cold. Normal people have clothes for defence against cold. But if you're going outside with your arms stretched out, and say to me: "I chose to have no clothes, cover my naked body with yours"... How gay are you?


And also, the proof (but I'm sure disbelievers will not start believing), in a form of message log:

Peeter:

1 second ago:
Peeter cast deflection on the party for a considerable amount of [50,968] points points!
13 seconds ago:
Peeter cast deflection on the party for a massive amount of [121,555] points!
6 minutes, 28 seconds ago:
Jolla cast deflection on the party for a minimal amount of [9,119] points!
6 minutes, 40 seconds ago:
Jolla cast deflection on the party for an adequate amount of [18,358] points!

I'm not bragging. Please tell me how much energy you used and what is your defence?

Jolla:
My defence is just a couple points shy of 200 right now. The first one was for 20 energy and the 2nd was for 10.

Peeter:
Thank you. My first was for 40 and the second was 20, and it seems it was not fully used. I have read rumours that there is a threshold where your defending ability gets better. Whether it's true or not, I wanted proof that high defence matters. I have 503 defence, and for the same amount of energy, I did deflect much more.

Thank you, you were helpful. And Gehenna is deflected.

Jolla:
Yes, the rumours are true. There are 3 thresholds that I know of. The first is at 200, once you reach it your defending ability will basically double on serpent battles. The next is at 400, I believe, and gives severe boost for the smaller world battles like Dark Legions. I don't know where the 3rd is but it is for everything else. Sadly there aren't any for attack (mine's just over 1200). I'm heavily built for PvP so I tend not to defend for much in monster battles, defence and energy are my 2 lowest stats (not counting health). The only monsters I do well on are hydras.

Peeter:
What's your source?

Jolla:
[A name] is the only one I can remember off the top of my head but I have heard it from many people. Most of which are well above your and my level.

Monday at 10:11 · Like
____
*they know who they are

Friday 17 December 2010

Ohh... Memories

Peeter:
Oh... My mouse stopped working.
Diana:
There are always keyboard shortcuts.
Peeter:
Not for everything, sadly.
Diana:
Nope, not for everything.
Peeter:
I have batteries for that.
Diana:
I didn't know it was a wireless one. I'm used to mouses being attached to the computer and not needing batteries.
Peeter:
I use two computers most of the time. Helix & Mimosa. Both have optical mice.
Diana:
I didn't know that. About the mice. I use the one with my laptop. Any desktop I use has a wired mouse.
Peeter:
Oh, sorry. I don't know why I used the wrong term again. All my mice are optical, those two are wireless.
Diana:
I understood that, you were correct.
Peeter:
I was, yes, but in addition of being optical, they were also wireless.
Diana:
Ah. They are two different things, aren't they? Optical means it doesn't come with a ball, it has a laser to tell how its moving.
Peeter:
Exactly.
Peeter:
I am not sure though... The computer that is currently in the kitchen might have a "ball" mouse. That computer has Windows 2000. It was bought in 2002 maybe. It was discharged from work this year.
Diana:
Might still have a ball mouse. 90's for sure, early 2000 is iffy. Depends how much was spent originally on the computer.
Peeter:
Hold on.
Peeter:
Yes, it's a ball mouse. But it's got scroll. And of course, not USB, but PS/2.
Peeter:
Do you know PS/2 is not the oldest? I have even used serial mouse. I bet you'd be confused if someone came to you with a serial mouse and a 1.44" floppy. Have you got 1.44 floppy drive?
Diana:
Excuse me? We used to have a Commodore 64. I'm used to a 5 1/2 inch floppy.
Peeter:
Oh. For old time's sake, I'd want a 5½ floppy drive. I even have some 5½ floppies. I have 1.44 floppy drive on that 2002 computer. I also had one on my sixth I bought in 2002, my first one I bought with my own money. I sold it for $2 US two years ago. Would have given it away, but we settled for a symbolic price.
Diana:
I have an external 1.44 that hooks up by usb port. My dad bought if for me to go with my first laptop. I needed something to transfer data from my laptop to other computers to print. At the time USB keys were really expensive for a small amount of space. This was 8 years ago now. The CD drive that came with it was not a R/W drive.
Peeter:
You know, at my university... I was one of the only ones to have homework on CDs... Later on I just uploaded it.
Peeter:
It's sad though. Teenagers and those who are toddlers now won't even know floppies. I remember I brought a 70 MB game to school... on floppies. It took like 40 floppies. I didn't have that many, so we brought it in in parts. And, of course, my hard disc space was 1.2 GB, so not to spare. I had deleted the RARs (RAR can pack in parts), and of course, at school, it appeared that one floppy was fucked, and thus I had to go home, redo the RARs and hope the one to be replaced fit to the ones I've made earlier.
Diana:
Sounds like a lot of work for just one game. Hope it was worth it.
Peeter:
Fun time. Annoying then, but a fond memory
Diana:
I need to go to bed. It's getting late for me.
Peeter:
Bye
Diana:
Bye.

To all my Estonian readers, this conversation actually was in English. It would have been lame to translate, if it were in Estonian.